Archive for March, 2005

Journalists’ Toolbox: Courts

Thursday, March 10th, 2005

Journalist Magazine
Jan/Feb 2005 issue
Report the Courts
By Heather Brooke

Journalists have tried-and-trusted ways of getting information, but every day new data goes online and even diligent reporters may be unaware of resources that would help their work immeasurable. In the first of a series of articles, the Journalists’ Toolbox, Heather Brooke lists internet sources for all the information you’ll need – this month reporting the UK courts and law.

The Department for Constitutional Affairs is the main source of information about the judicial system. A quick browse of the publication scheme will reveal information the DCA has committed to make public. The statistical publications page provides a wealth of information useful in court stories, such as statistics on waiting times at courts and user satisfaction surveys.

The DCA also holds information about Judges. In the US, reporters collect public databases of case decisions and analyse them by judge to track patterns of sentencing or reveal prejudice. This is all but impossible in the UK, but you can get basic information about judges such as a listing of judges by gender and ethnicity, available on the DCA website under ‘Judicial statistics’. These figures are useful when covering allegations of sexism or racism in the justice system. A list of all judges by name, when they were appointed and for what circuit is online at http://www.dca.gov.uk/judicial/lists/cj_list.htm. Judges’ salary scales are also available.
(more…)

The drugs I need…

Thursday, March 10th, 2005

View film

The Consumers Union in the USA has just released this amusing animation for its ‘Prescription for Change’ campaign. The CU supports the American FACT Act, which is going through Congress at the moment. The bill would require drug companies to make public all the results of their clinical trials and create an independent office of drug safety in the Food and Drug Administration to ensure quick action is taken when safety concerns are raised.

In the UK by comparison, none of the clinical trials for drugs have been published and until last year it was actually a crime to make these details public even when they were obviously in the public interest. The Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (the UK equivalent of the American FDA) had to ask permission from pharmaceutical companies before it could make such information public.

This prohibition on disclosure (section 118 of the Medicines Act 1968) has now been amended to make it compatible with the Freedom of Information Act, though originally I was told it would be repealed altogether.

The chapter on ‘Health’ in Your Right to Know goes into greater detail about drug safety and the lack of information given to the public. A number of informative articles and suggestions for campaign action in this country can be found on the website No Free Lunch, run by a group of UK healthcare providers concerned about drug companies’ over-zealous promotional practices.

UK Spending on Health: Cabinet Office FOI Release

Wednesday, March 9th, 2005

The Cabinet Office has published its response to a FOI request for details of discussions between 10 Downing Street and HM Treasury about plans to increase the UK’s spending on health to meet the European average.

You can download a copy of the response issued by the Prime Minister’s Office from the Cabinet Office disclosure log or by clicking on the link below.

Health spending (PDF 288KB)

Getting information from the Cabinet Office is like squeezing blood from a stone as this letter makes clear. A bare minimum of information is given out and exemption 21 is used – ‘Information accesible by other means’. When this exemption is used, section 16 of the Act and good practice guidelines advise public authorities to provide detail about where the information is currently available and how to access it. The Cabinet Office has not done this.

Concurrently, the Department of Health released a document today that gives details on how, and on what, the NHS’ £33 billion budget was spent in 2004. The DoH states that the Reference Costs/Reference Costs Index publication is ‘the richest source of financial data on the NHS ever produced.’

‘The main purpose of the data is to provide a basis for comparison within (and outside) the NHS between organisations, and down to the level of individual treatments.’

Airline Inspection & Permits

Tuesday, March 8th, 2005

Information released by the Department for Transport in response to a Freedom of Information request regarding airline inspections and permits. Published 7 March 2005.

Air France Concorde crash

Tuesday, March 8th, 2005

Another release from the Department for Transport in response to a Freedom of Information request. This one relates to correspondence between the DfT and the Air Accidents Investigation Branch concerning the crash of Air France Concorde F-BTSC on July 25 2000. Published 7 March 2005.

MI5 files released at National Archives

Monday, March 7th, 2005

The National Archives have released a number of MI5 records this week. They include secret tips for Russian spies coming to London in the 1930s. Look in file KV 2 /137 (a hard copy is available to view online). These particular documents were seized by the Germans from a Russian agent captured in Paris during the Second World War and provide a list of the smart hotels of London and where the spy about town should eat out.

This is the first release of Security Service records since the full implementation of the Freedom of Information Act in January 2005. This introduction will give you more information about the release and the National Archive’s filing system. Though the security services are exempt from the Act (unlike in the United States), they do make some records available. This release is the twelfth and largest ever publication of Security Service records and contains 357 files. This brings the total number of MI5 records in the public domain to just 2,500.

Compare this measley amount to the number of declassified security documents released to the National Security Archive in the USA: 100,000 released documents, 30,000 intelligence files on individuals and organisations (amount released in UK = 0), 20,000 records released in response to FOIA requests (zero records released in UK in response to FOIA as intelligence services are exempt!)

Here is a brief overview and description of the most interesting and noteworthy files from MI5 released by the National Archives in March.

FOI media roundup: week ending March 7

Monday, March 7th, 2005

Here is a round-up of stories generated by the the Freedom of Information Act. Thanks to Steve Wood for noting many of these stories on his FOIA weblog.

6 March 2005
Sunday Times
Britain’s biggest private landowner nets £1m in EU handouts

“The subsidies paid to Britain’s farmers have traditionally been kept secret, but The Sunday Times has made an application to the government for the amounts to be revealed under the new Freedom of Information Act. The government is due to rule on the application later this month, but some landowners are already disclosing the information.

The Sunday Times has obtained details of subsidies across the country. The counties claiming the most in 2003 were North Yorkshire with £121m, Lincolnshire with £113m and Devon with £84m.”

Sunday Times Comment

“Last week this paper, using the Freedom of Information Act, obtained a breakdown of assaults on teachers. Now we discover that so bad is the disruption, of both the low-level and the off-the-Richter-scale variety, that Graham Donaldson, the senior chief inspector of schools, admitted that children were being prevented from learning and reaching their full potential.
…So frightened is it of exposing the real extent of indiscipline in schools that [Peter] Peacock has stopped publishing annual statistics on classroom violence. We do know that incidents rose from 1,000 in 2000 to 7,000 in 2004, and that every 12 minutes a teacher in Scotland suffered some level of abuse from a pupil. But from now on, we will have to rely on anecdotal evidence, HM Inspectorate reports, and maybe the Freedom of Information Act, to keep us abreast of the facts. “

Independent
UK taxpayers spend £195m on fees for aircraft carrier project

“Details of the amount of money spent on the project were revealed by the MoD’s Defence Procurement Agency, in response to a Freedom of Information request lodged by The Independent on Sunday.”

5 March 2005
North-west Evening Mail (Barrow-in-Furness, Lake District)

“An Evening Mail request under the Freedom of Information Act revealed a 15 per cent overall increase in cases of MRSA between 2003 and 2004.”

4 March 2005
Hampstead Express (London)

“Parking chiefs at Camden have charged £700 to supply data under the Freedom of Information Act… even though some of the facts are freely available on the Internet.
Simon Aldridge, 37, who owns recycling business Pulp Faction, sent Camden 15 questions asking for information about parking fines issued in the borough. The town hall sent a response that it said covered 13 of the queries, but slapped a £703.60 price tag for answers to the other two questions.”

3 March 2005

Guardian
AstraZeneca cholesterol drug ‘no worse than other treatments’

“In the UK, minutes released under the Freedom of Information Act, released to the Guardian, showed the UK’s expert regulatory body, the committee on safety of medicines, has con sistently seen a “signal” of higher rates of the muscle wasting disease, rhabdomyolysis, in patients taking the drug, compared with other statins. “

CJD deaths linked to school meat
Western Mail (Wales)
School dinners eaten by three young people in Wales may have resulted in their deaths from the human form of mad cow disease, a previously secret report has revealed.

2 March 2005
Guardian
Secret Home Office papers on prison row fail to clear Howard
“Papers released last night under the Freedom of Information Act throw new light on Michael Howard’s performance in his infamous grilling by Jeremy Paxman.”

1 March 2005
Government Computing -

“Whitehall has revealed some details of its 10 most at risk IT projects, following a Freedom of Information request. The Office of Government Commerce (OGC) has released details of IT projects found to be most at risk across Whitehall, but is keeping the projects’ identities secret.”

The response from the OGC is available as a PDF.

The Herald (Glasgow, Scotland)

“Police officers in Scotland are avoiding official complaints procedures by resigning or retiring early. According to figures obtained by The Herald under The Freedom of Information Act, scores leave the force each year whilst subject to misconduct investigations.”

Bury St Edmonds today

“Chief executive of the council, Deborah Cadman told Thursday’s cabinet meeting that they were already being hit with detailed questions, particularly over the Cattle Market. ‘We have had 29 request for information under the act so far and the majority of those are very complex,’ she said”

28th February 2005
Daily Record

“Scotland’s richest gangster received £218,000 of legal aid when he was tried on drug-smuggling charges.The amount of taxpayers’ money he received was revealed yesterday under the new Freedom of Information Act.”

Spacereview – A different kind of openness

“By originally failing to make the report on the loss of Beagle 2 (above) publicly available, the usefulness of the report was greatly diminished. In January, the Beagle 2 investigation report was finally released. Unfortunately, the obfuscation did not stop then. At the time of the release, BNSC stated that “in view of the Committee’s strongly held view that the report should be published in full, we have discussed the issue again with ESA and have persuaded them that the report should be published.
What BNSC left out of its statement was that it was actually the British magazine New Scientist that had forced their hand. New Scientist filed a request under the United Kingdom’s new Freedom of Information Act to force the document’s release. The magazine’s editors thought it was not a good idea to leave the dead dog alone.”

Heart surgery death rates published

Friday, March 4th, 2005

A group of surgeons have published their individual mortality rates for the first time. As well as revealing the percentage of patients who died, they have included information on the risk factors of operations, such as old age and a heart in poor condition.

This is a great victory for patients and the public’s right to know. Yet many heart surgeons are still refusing to make this information.

The Guardian
Sarah Boseley, health editor
Friday March 4, 2005

Twenty-five surgeons from north-west England publish their individual mortality rates for heart operations today, setting a precedent for other doctors who are under pressure from the public to reveal their results.

The surgeons say they hope their move will promote openness and transparency within the NHS.

Read the full article on the Guardian’s website.

Manchester Training

Friday, March 4th, 2005

11 March 2005
Manchester
See the NUJ website for more information and to book

Using the Freedom of Information Act and open records laws
This training session will be held at:

NUJ
5th Floor
Arthur House
Chorlton Street
Manchester
M1 3FH

Tel: 0161 237 5020
E-mail: nujmanchester@nuj.org.uk
Map and directions

Records Concerning British Airways’ Decision to Stop Flying Concorde

Thursday, March 3rd, 2005

In response to a FOIA request, the Department for Transport has today released the following records on British Airways’ decision to scrap Concorde. Documents are available to download from the DfT’s disclosure log, but below is a summary of what is available. The documents are very enlightening particularly the correspondence between Virgin and BA. There is a big story here about BA’s lack of accountability for the huge sums of taxpayer money that were given to the company to build and run the Concorde programme.

  • Letter from BA to the Prime Minister – 10 April 2003 (PDF 296 Kb)
    Letter released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • Letter from Virgin to BA – 28 April 2003 (PDF 256 Kb)
    Letter released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • Letter from BA to Virgin – 29 April 2003 (PDF 730 Kb)
    Letter released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • Internal DfT e-mails – 29 April 2003 (PDF 140 Kb)
    Released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • BA Statement – 29 April 2003 (PDF 176 Kb)
    Released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • Letter from the Prime Minister to BA – 30 April 2003 (PDF 105 Kb)
    Letter released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • DTI Minister’s briefing on responding to Virgin letters – 2 May 2003 (PDF 11 Kb)
    Released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • Letter from DTI to Virgin – 6 May 2003 (PDF 168 Kb)
    Released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • Letter from Virgin to DTI – 16 June 2003 (PDF 149 Kb)
    Letter released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • Letter from BA to Virgin – 26 June 2003 (PDF 542 Kb)
    Letter released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • Letter from Virgin to BA – 23 June 2003 (PDF 312 Kb)
    Letter released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • DfT Briefing note 1 – 16 July 2003 (PDF 17 Kb)
    Released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.
  • DfT Briefing note 2 – 22 October 2003 (PDF 17 Kb)
    Released in response to an FOI request regarding the decision to stop flying Concorde. Published: 3 March 2005.