Archive for September, 2005

A Right to Know on BBC Radio 4

Friday, September 30th, 2005

Radio 4 Tuesday 27th Sept – repeated Sunday 2 October at 5pm and available online (for a week or so afterward) at:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/radio4_aod.shtml?radio4/right_to_know

This was an interesting programme in which investigative reporter Michael Crick and producer Martin Rosenbaum made a number of FOI requests to test the new Freedom of Information laws. They were successful in some requests – such as gaining access to Special Branch police files held on anti-apartheid protestors – but less so in many more cases. For example the Metropolitan Police simply ignored their request for the ‘shoot to kill policy’ and Downing Street mindlessly refused to release the Prime Minister’s Christmas card list on the grounds that to do so would offend those not included – though surely they would know this by fact they don’t receive a card!

Those interviewed included myself, Maurice Frankel of the Campaign for Freedom of Information, Patrick Lavelle, who is doing research on the Police and FOI at the University of Sunderland, Friends of the Earth solicitor Phil Michaels, and Paul Hutcheon who is political editor of the Sunday Herald (Scotland) and has made a record 400+ requests. Those on the establishment side included David Chinchen of the Metropolitan Police, Information Commissioner Richard Thomas, and the Lord Chancellor Charlie Falconer.

The highlight of the programme had to be Crick challenging Charlie Falconer’s idealistic rhetoric on openness with the ugly reality of delays and denials that Crick received from Falconer’s own department in response to his FOI requests.

Costly Crown Copyright

Tuesday, September 27th, 2005

Why we must cut the costly Crown copyright
The Times Law section, 27 September 2005
By Heather Brooke

The Green Party called for the repeal of Crown Copyright at its recent party conference, the latest in a growing campaign to abolish restrictive copyrights on public sector information and encourage greater re-use by citizens and business.

In an unusual alliance, pro-democracy advocates and big business want an end to the complex copyright system in which public authorities up and down the country are restricting access to everything from staff directories and restaurant inspections to tidal timetables. Even plans to create a national database of postal addresses have stumbled because the various public bodies involved can’t agree who owns the copyright to postal addresses! “In the UK, excessive intellectual property rights prevent access to and dissemination of vast areas of knowledge,” says Matt Wootton, of the Green Party. “Our policy seeks to abolish Crown and other types of restrictive copyright that restricts most material originated by ministers and civil servants, which has been paid for by the UK taxpayer.”
(more…)

Cabinet Office Statement on Trading Funds

Tuesday, September 27th, 2005

Trading funds are public bodies mandated to make money using public sector information. Unfortunately, they hold the most useful data – land registration (held by the Land Registry), mapping (Ordnance Survey), weather (Meteorological Office) and sea charts (UK Hydrographic Office) – so charging hefty fees greatly stifles many civic projects.

I received this statement from the Cabinet Office which shows the government is still committed to restricting public access to this data. As stated in my article, restrictive copyright of public information actually ends up costing the taxpayer much more, both economically and in terms of social welfare.

“The Government does not regard the status or funding of Trading Funds as an obstacle to the re-use of government information and has no plans to make changes.

“Trading Funds in the UK were established to be self-supporting whilst also making a return to the public purse by selling services. If they were unable to charge for information services that have a potential commercial value, they would either need public funding, which would increase costs for the taxpayer, or they would be forced to reduce the amount or quality of the information they provide.

“Under the UK Regulations on the re-use of public sector information, trading funds, like any other European public sector bodies, may charge for the re-use of public sector information. The Regulations state that the charges should not exceed the cost of collection, production, reproduction and dissemination of information as well as a reasonable return on investment.”

- Cabinet Spokesman (Stephen Coomber)

Hurricane Katrina and FOI

Monday, September 12th, 2005

The poor response to Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, USA shows in stark terms the consequences of diverting all money to the war on terror while ignoring more prosaic realities at home. America is not unique in diverting funds this way. In the UK, we have seen parts of London stripped bare as police are diverted to fight the war on terror – leaving the city itself vulnerable.

Crying terrorism is now the favourite pasttime of politicians eager to be free from the glare of public accountability. Tony Blair’s refusal to tell the British public where he was spending his summer holiday (and at whose expense) comes to mind. George W Bush trots out the terrorism wail any time he is asked to answer difficult questions.

The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press in the US has released a newly updated edition of its report on the effects of the war on terrorism and the public’s right to know. See RCFP’s ‘Homefront Confidential’.

Reporters in the US are already making the connection between Bush’s intense secrecy and the effects of Hurricane Katrina. The Society of Environmental Journalists has criticised the United States Environmental Protection Agency for its delay in responding to requests about the environmental impacts of Katrina. The group’s report has lessons for all British environmental reporters and campaigners: ‘A Flawed Tool–Environmental Reporters’ experiences With the Freedom of Information Act’.

Another American citizens’ rights group, OMB Watch, has posted an initial compilation of potentially toxic sites in the industrial areas in and around New Orleans that may require remedial action in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.

Thanks to Steven Aftergood’s Secrecy News for these resources.