Archive for February, 2006

Commissioner rules on BBC Governors' meeting

Tuesday, February 21st, 2006

The Information Commissioner rejected my appeal for the minutes of the BBC Governors meeting which resulted in the resignation of Director General Greg Dyke. The Guardian covered the story.


Dyke files to remain under wraps

Chris Tryhorn
Friday February 17, 2006

Ms Brooke, who is working on a second edition of her book Your Right to Know, criticised the information commissioner’s decision.

“This decision upholds the archaic belief that you can only have good decision making in secrecy,” she said. “It has been proved time and again that it’s a fallacy.

“The best decisions are made in the open because the people who are making them know they will have to be accountable for them.

“The governors have to be willing as leaders to take responsibility for the decisions they make. Unless the minutes are made public, you can’t have any confidence they made a reasonable decision.”

FOI in Parliament: 8-13 February 2006

Thursday, February 9th, 2006

Highlights this week include the revelation that the Information Commissioner has himself received 17 FOI requests related to the excessive time taken to close clases (Written Answers 13 Feb 2006)

8 Feb 2006
Written Answers – Prime Minister: Freedom of Information Act
Bob Spink: To ask the Prime Minister what total sum has been received by his Office for the provision of information under the *Freedom of Information* Act 2000 in its first year of operation.
Tony Blair (Prime Minister) – Nil.

Written Answers – Transport: Freedom of Information
Bob Spink: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what total sum has been received by his Department for the provision of information under the *Freedom of Information* Act 2000 in its first year of operation.
(more…)

Article: Policing of protests

Wednesday, February 8th, 2006

Tough on the causes of peace
The Times, Thunderer, 8 February 2006
by Heather Brooke

Forget all this namby-pamby peaceful protesting. The only way to grab a politician’s ear is to do so with force. That’s the loud and clear message from the authorities. The police record clearly shows they take a softly-softly approach towards religious extremists who threaten violence, but a sledgehammer approach when faced with peaceful protesters.

The Islamic protests last weekend in London have led to questions in Parliament about why the police failed to arrest those holding placards advocating mass murder. Meanwhile, the police have shown no delay in arresting peaceful protesters. According to Hansard, police have arrested 28 people protesting peacefully for taking part in “unauthorised demonstrations” in the “designated area” around Parliament since August 2005. The Met arrested 57 peaceful protesters outside an arms trade exhibition in September 2005. These protesters went so far as to dance in the street; a few climbed on top of a standing train.

You can see the mistake made by these deluded activists. They clung to the belief that the Government rewards those who play by the rules with a listening ear. But the Serious Organised Crime Act makes it an offence to protest peacefully outside Parliament. The Government sees no difference between dancing in the street and inciting beheading.

Peaceful protests are the steam valves for a democratic society, so by criminalising all protests, no matter how participants behave, the temptation is to say: “What the hell, let’s go for it!”

And this is exactly what has come to pass. Just look at Fathers4Justice. Hundreds of law-abiding families and lobbyists tried for years to reform the failing family justice system. Then suddenly a gang of thugs invades Parliament, throws condoms at the Prime Minister and posts letters of excrement to the head of the Family Court and before you know it – bam! The family courts are reformed.

This is a dangerous message for any government to send out to its people. For it is a drawn-out process to achieve change peacefully. Those treading the path must feel their efforts may be rewarded. Instead, the vast powers of the police to arrest are influenced by politics and political correctness. On one hand they are tough on the peaceful; on the other they are soft on the thugs who march under the banner of Islam.

If you are interested in protesting against the Westminster no protest zone, you might like to sign this pledge.