<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The blacked out bits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heatherbrooke.org/2009/what-the-committee-considers-libellous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heatherbrooke.org/2009/what-the-committee-considers-libellous/</link>
	<description>Heather Brooke is an award-winning writer, journalist and activist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:13:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://heatherbrooke.org/2009/what-the-committee-considers-libellous/comment-page-1/#comment-2299</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yrtk.org/?p=917#comment-2299</guid>
		<description>This essay says everything I feel about the issue of MPs expenses. It brilliantly, and exactly, lays down what Westminster needs to do to regain the trust of the voters. I wish I had the talent to write as concisely as this, Heather.

I&#039;m now going to browse and read your site because you write so well. Good luck with your campaign, I will follow your progress closely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This essay says everything I feel about the issue of MPs expenses. It brilliantly, and exactly, lays down what Westminster needs to do to regain the trust of the voters. I wish I had the talent to write as concisely as this, Heather.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m now going to browse and read your site because you write so well. Good luck with your campaign, I will follow your progress closely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://heatherbrooke.org/2009/what-the-committee-considers-libellous/comment-page-1/#comment-2298</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 13:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yrtk.org/?p=917#comment-2298</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s mental.  The only ones that look even potentially defamatory are the Keith Vaz comments, and even those could simply be edited to avoid the ambiguity: unedited it looks like you&#039;re suggesting that Vaz put forward the edited tube tickets, as opposed to the editing being done later, and that *all* of his bin collections were on expenses.

As you say, the rest all appear to be well-established, or are clearly your opinion.  Perhaps the Committee&#039;s real lawyer was on holiday, and this is a work experience kid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s mental.  The only ones that look even potentially defamatory are the Keith Vaz comments, and even those could simply be edited to avoid the ambiguity: unedited it looks like you&#8217;re suggesting that Vaz put forward the edited tube tickets, as opposed to the editing being done later, and that *all* of his bin collections were on expenses.</p>
<p>As you say, the rest all appear to be well-established, or are clearly your opinion.  Perhaps the Committee&#8217;s real lawyer was on holiday, and this is a work experience kid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Arnold</title>
		<link>http://heatherbrooke.org/2009/what-the-committee-considers-libellous/comment-page-1/#comment-2297</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yrtk.org/?p=917#comment-2297</guid>
		<description>Tom Steinberg must be a bit pissed off.  His is the only name you mention in the whole article that they don&#039;t want redacted!  Even worse I think you may have defamed him by suggesting that he may have &quot;technical problems&quot;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Steinberg must be a bit pissed off.  His is the only name you mention in the whole article that they don&#8217;t want redacted!  Even worse I think you may have defamed him by suggesting that he may have &#8220;technical problems&#8221;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
