I would like you to get involved with my legal case from the outset, so that you too can experience the unjust British Judiciary that i am battling, where even Court Official Transcrips have gone missing and there is absolutely nothing that you can do about it, Unless of course you have SHED Loads of money to spend, unlike me (the ordinary citizen).

I will be more than happy for you to expose how UNJUST the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the Confiscation Orders are to INNOCENT members of the public like myself and How Legal Purchases can become Illegal Purchases in the blink of an eye in a British Court of Justice. I would like you to help me battle this system so that we can get this OUTDATED Act UPDATED and True Justice can prevail.

I would like to see if you have any luck in finding out How Many POCA Cases have been won by a defendant in comparison with the CPS. As the Court is so reluctant to even hazard a guess?

The POCA is so CPS friendly, supportive, and weighted with full support of Judges especially in Bradford. Yet, the Defendant’s side is so weak that they can scream INNOCENT and this falls on deaf ears, as there is no way in the UK they can win. I speak from personal experience and this is FACT.

I cannot understand how this has been allowed to happen in the British Judiciary and I would like your full support to expose this weak link in the Courts today, so that innocent purchases are not taken away so that the Poice Fund can be topped up on mear guesswork and help of their local judge but true fairness and justice can be dished out to all and sundery.

Please contact me as I know that I have got a very mammoth task ahead of me and could do with a Wise person on board, who is not afraid to take the UK Legal System on to change or mend it’s ways.

Kind Regards
Yasmin

I just wonder whether you might lend your name, weight and experience to our collective efforts of getting Fair Trials and Compensation for victims of a system of justice that clearly is none.

Might you click on http://victims-unite.net and look at the 30 case stories there and on http://3dm1297.info?

With my very best wishes for your most remarkable work,

Sabine
Mckenzie Friend, web publisher and online activist

Let the Magistrate have the freedom to hand out justice I say, rather than be overseen by the man or woman from the Ministry or judicial system I say. Then and only then will real justice be seen to be done and delivered !!!!!

The courts will only work when there is justice in the country and when the judges stop trying to run the nation – until then I wish you all a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 2011 !!!!

In Bradford Crown Court, on 6th September 2007, when I had made a TRUE RECORD of Ronald Castree’s bail application hearing (sic) I was arrested by the Police, my tape recorder was taken from me, I was put into a Cell in the court and later that evening I was brought before Judge (sic) Gullick and opted to represent myself, this enraged Gullick and he threatened that if I did not accept HIS choice of legal representation he would send me to prison for TWO YEARS.

Gullock made an Order that I be detained in a Police Station overnight and brought before him in the morning. I was taken to Keighley Police Station, where the Police refused to interview me on tape, which was an abuse of process under the PACE Act 1984. I was also refused access to my pen and notepad, as I wanted to make notes and outline my defence to the court that it was in the public interest and the interests of JUSTICE that I tape recorded MY Client’s Mr Castree’s hearing, as he was being stitched-up for the murder of Lesley Molseed, as ALL the evidence put Peter Sutcliffe in the frame.

Having no sleep, as the police were kicking and banging my cell door all night, I was returned to Bradford Crown Court and brought before Gullick again, where I requested that he stand himself down due to a conflict of interest, as he had earlier dealt with my clients application for bail, and had refused it. Gullick refused to recuse himself; thereby having NO jurisdiction and operating a Kangaroo court to cover-up serious crime and send me to Jail for four months for being a GOOD citizen in trying to expose the cover-up.

Gullick’s chosen legal representative, Stephen Wood QC, was FULLY aware of the abuse of process and that Ronald Castree had given me written authorisation to act on his behalf when Noel O’Gara accompanied me on a Legal Visit with him in HM Armley Prison on 26 August 2007

You will see in the link below that Noel O’Gara was jailed for taking a photograph of the Police Officers who had harassed us in the Court Room and refused to identify themselves when asked repeatedly to do so. The photograph was for identification purposes, as the Police were acting outside of the law.

Halifax Courier – Published Date: 07 September 2007
Pair jailed for recording court hearing
TWO men have been sent to prison for recording court proceedings.
http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/Pair-jailed-for-recording-court.3185526.jp

Noel O’Gara and George Wescott choose me, Patrick Cullinane, as their legal representative, but Gullick refused this also, which infringed their Human Rights under Article 6 (3c) of the ECHR.

Stephen Wood QC, who was supposed to be defending me, has ignored all my correspondence requesting the return of my Court File on this matter.

To date, the Police have NOT returned my Tape Recorder, or Noel O’Gara’s Mobile Phone, which is theft of our property.

And to cap it all; we cannot get a TRANSCRIPT of the hearing (sic) that sent us to Prison – via an abuse of process. This skulduggery is so outrageous, that you could not make it up.

Heather Brooke rightly states: “The courts are open but justice is a closed book”

Therefore, in the public interest and interest of justice: Section 9 of the Contempt of Court Act must be repealed forthwith.

Patrick Cullinane: – BIG victim of these RECORDLESS Kangaroo Courts in the UK.

Just starting to study law myself, and the thing that struck me was the whole point of tribunals was the potential for a level of anonymity/confidentiality as opposed to the civil/criminal court system when things are more open?

Do you think that justice can ever be anonymous and or confidential from the public?

http://www.annaraccoon.com/category/court-of-protection/

The practice directions on this – http://www.justice.gov.uk/criminal/procrules_fin/contents/practice_direction/part1.htm#id6178056 – do make some sensible points as to why there is a restriction.
Dozens of people fiddling with devices, changing batteries, etc could be disruptive. How can you be sure of capturing all testimony unless everyone is miked up? How do you stop people using recordings to influence future witnesses in a way much more compelling than written notes?
While you scorn the court ‘controlling’ them, recordings could easily be manipulated, edited and recut in a way that ridicules the court – which is bad for democracy overall.

If you want to campaign, concentrate on access to court lists and results. The could and should be publically accessible – and more so than the details currently available via the Ministry of Justice and Courtel.

One solution would be for the court to make and – after editing out such items – publish recordings. This would also counter concerns about “manipulation”. It would also allow for courts to be properly mic’d.

I have just put up a request at the Government Web site “Your Freedom” calling for the abolition of Section 9 of the Contempt of Court Act.
http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/repealing-unnecessary-laws/abolish-the-ban-on-recording-court-proceedings. Please join and comment to it

One negative aspect is that a transcript of the judgment part of the proceedings must be approved by the judge before the transcript is sent to the person requesting – and paying for – the transcript which means that, technically, the judge can alter the transcript from what is actually said at the hearing.

You might consider looking into another issue which is the gross discrimination against litigants in person – who have the right in law to represent themselves in court – both by judges who despise litigants in person and rule against them even when their case is clearly presented and supported by statutory law and by court staff who place obstructions in the filing of documents and acknowledgement of receipt of the filing.